Storytelling

Your Plot Is a Fractal

In 2014, I was researching best practices for writing scenes when I noticed something: they looked an awful lot like the best practices for a whole novel. The concepts were the same; they’d just been given different names. I wrote an article declaring plots were fractals and moved on to other things, leaving my fractal-story theory to collect dust for a couple years.

But the deeper I dove into plot and structure, the more I found myself returning to the fractal nature of stories. Because of this, I slowly developed the theory further and introduced new terminology to discuss it. Unfortunately, these developments were scattered across many articles, making it difficult for readers to sort out. To create one reference that explains fractal structure, I’ve rewritten the article that started it all. You can read the original 2014 version via PDF.

What’s a Fractal and How Do Plots Fit In?

A fractal is a pattern often found in nature. It consists of some shape or structure that repeats at different scales. If you take a fractal pattern and put it under a microscope, you might see the same thing no matter how you change the magnification level. For example, look at the image below. You’ll see a swirly sun pattern with identical smaller swirly sun patterns inside it and even smaller swirly sun patterns inside that.

For stories, what repeats is a simple three-point structure that’s great at capturing human attention. At the risk of sounding like a broken record, below is this three-point structure in brief.

  1. The problem: This is a situation that creates uncertainty and generates  tension. Elsewhere, these problems might be referred to as openings, hooks, inciting incidents, or dramatic questions. From here until the next point, tension will rise.
  2. The turning point: At the climax of tension, the protagonist struggling with the story’s problem is sorely tested. In that moment, they either prove themself worthy or they fall short. This point isn’t positioned in the center of the story; it is close to the end. From here, tension falls rapidly.
  3. The resolution: If the protagonist was worthy, the problem is solved. If they were unworthy, something bad happens. Either way, uncertainty is gone and tension dissipates, leaving the audience with a feeling of satisfaction.

Using this structure just once would leave a lot of empty space in between those three points, particularly for large stories such as novels. We have to fill that space, and naturally we want to fill it with more content that captures attention. So we end up recreating the same structure at a smaller scale. Basically, these smaller stories are present for the same reason the bigger one is: it’s entertaining.

While in theory a fractal pattern could repeat forever, in practice they have limits. Even if you’re writing a ten-book novel series, your story will only be so big. Then, because words are indivisible units of meaning, it can only get so small. For a 100-word micro story, three-point story structure is still technically there, but it’s pretty fuzzy. As you go down in scale, the turning point gets simpler and then merges with the resolution.

You can create a visual representation of a story fractal by graphing the level of tension over time, but unfortunately, it isn’t particularly pretty. It looks as if you took a two-dimensional slice of that fractal broccoli in the top image and skewed it so the left side was a long uphill climb and the right was a short cliff back to the bottom.

How Does This Work in Practice?

A single instance of a story’s three-point structure could stand on its own as a complete work, or it could be one small brick in a large house. When story structure is a brick, I usually refer to it as an “arc” or alternatively a “line.” When you’re describing a story with many stories in it, calling them all “stories” gets confusing fast.

Let’s have a look at the many layers of arcs that together would create a larger story like a novel. To discuss the relationships all these arcs have to each other, we can think of them as a family tree with the trunk representing everyone’s common ancestor and the branches their descendants.

The trunk is the story’s throughline. This is the highest level arc that holds a story together. Below is an example arc that works as a throughline.

  1. Problem: A dystopian government is oppressing its people.
  2. Turning point: By implementing a clever plan to expose the government’s lies, the protagonist inspires everyone to revolt.
  3. Resolution: The oppressive government falls apart, and work toward a more democratic government begins.

Now let’s have that tree trunk split off into large branches: child arcs for the throughline. Just like this tree trunk, an arc can have two or more children.* Lots of child arcs would generally mean the family tree has fewer generations. It would be a shorter, wider tree.

Below, I’ve given my example throughline three children.

  1. The oppressive government is hunting the protagonist. By choosing to fight against the system instead of looking out for their own interests, the protagonist finds a safe haven among the resistance fighters.
  2. The government is pushing forward new measures that would make resistance all but impossible. The protagonist finds potential allies who could stop it, but fails to do as they ask. These valuable allies leave, and the resistance leaders are separated and put under lockdown.
  3. The government has started a new war to boost popular support and sends dissidents to the front lines. Leading what’s left of the resistance, the protagonist creates a clever plan to expose the lies the government has told about this conflict. The general public revolts, and the oppressive government falls apart.

You might notice that the last child has the same turning point as the throughline. The parent arc is overlaid on top of its children, and it climaxes as the final child arc does. By then, most parent arcs will have taken over. There’s still a child arc present there, but after it opens with a smaller problem, it merges into the parent arc.

Stories don’t stop with one level of child arcs. Those child arcs have their own children – grandchildren of the throughline. Let’s take that first direct child arc and examine what its children could look like. This time, let’s say it has two children instead of three.

  1. The protagonist is caught in possession of banned books, for which the punishment is a lifetime of forced labor. By boldly masquerading as one of the prison commanders, the protagonist escapes.
  2. The protagonist is now a wanted criminal with nowhere to go. Looking for help, they find others who are dealing in banned books. To keep the government from catching these book dealers, the protagonist ends up turning themself in. This inspires the resistance to rescue them and give them shelter.

While I’ve given examples of arcs, I haven’t specified the scale. Everything here is too complicated to fit into a short story, but it would work as either a novel or a series. The first level of child arcs could be three parts of a single novel, or they could be three novels. The two grandchild arcs could be two chapters, or they could be a novel split into two parts.

As chapters, they’d still have their own children that are about the size of a scene. Because the beginnings and endings of scenes and chapters are arbitrary, there isn’t necessarily one arc per scene or chapter – but there could be. Giving scenes and chapters a complete arc gives the audience a satisfying place to stop.

Once you get smaller than the scene level, a story’s three-point structure gets blurrier. However, even paragraphs can have it.

Novels tend to have a deep structure and a high tension throughline – a taller, narrower tree with a thick truck. But that’s not the case for all stories. Some stories, such as many TV shows, have a more episodic structure. This means the throughline has lots of children, and those children are high tension in comparison to the throughline. To read more about this, see my article on plotting a novel series or on writing a travel story.

Last, many if not most stories also have subplots. For instance, the protagonist of my dystopian story probably has a character arc and might have a romance arc too. These subplots are more family trees, though they’re less likely to span the entire story and they probably don’t qualify as the throughline.

To keep the story tight and entertaining, subplots need to share scenes with the throughline’s tree. My protagonist would grow as a person and flirt with their love interest while they are also dealing with the oppressive government – something we call multitasking. You don’t need to multitask for every scene, but generally, you shouldn’t focus solely on a subplot for more than one scene at a time.

Why Does All This Matter?

Fractal plotting might seem too abstract and complicated to be practical. Do writers really need to know this stuff, or am I just in love with my own ideas? While an editor or teacher generally needs a more comprehensive knowledge of story theory than the average writer, writers still benefit from understanding the fractal nature of stories.

It Answers Questions About Scale

Over the years, Mythcreants has gotten many questions about how to plot a novel series. Without a thorough understanding of fractal structure, it’s difficult to grasp that all of our plotting advice applies to series just as it applies to novels.

There is no secret ingredient for plotting a series; you just make a throughline for the series as a whole and a child arc for each book. If you want to make a series of short stories, do the same thing. The only thing that matters is whether you make your problems big enough that you can stretch them out for ten books or small enough to solve in a piece of flash fiction.

Similarly, whether you have five books in a series or two, you’ll be following the same principles. Subdivide your series throughline into a series of challenges that build toward the series turning point. Give each subdivision its own arc.

It Makes Learning Easier

It’s inefficient to learn the same concepts over again every time you examine stories at a different scale, such as scene, chapter, book, or series. Instead, it’s faster to learn how the same concepts apply to the new scale by examining examples of structure at that level.

This also means that any insights gained by studying structure at one scale could be used at a different scale. After you learn how to end chapters so they feel satisfying but still have a hook to keep readers going, you can use that for books in a series.

It Sheds Light on Plotting Conundrums

Many writers want an easy step-by-step procedure they can follow to create a solid plot, and advice givers try to meet that demand. But from what I’ve seen, these efforts only result in over-hyped formulas like the hero’s journey. Many claim the hero’s journey applies to all stories, but it does not. Many believe it’s helpful, but it mostly offers a false sense of security.

Instead of offering a simple and supposedly universal formula, some advice givers try to split stories into plot categories. Then they make step-by-step instructions for each category. However, these instructors either end up lumping very different stories together or making a zillion categories.

The issue is that stories have two contradictory qualities: they are so different that no structure seems to fit all of them, yet some structures obviously work better than others. They are like this because it’s the fractal form itself that matters. It can be stretched and scaled in a myriad of ways, but as long as you have that repeating three-point structure, your story will work. Unfortunately, using fractal structure is not as simple as following step-by-step instructions. But once you learn it, you’ll have endless options.

P.S. Our bills are paid by our wonderful patrons. Could you chip in?

Read more about ,

 

Comments

  1. SunlessNick

    This may be one of your best articles ever.

  2. Grandala

    This article was eye-opening in aspects for plotting a story

  3. Sarah West

    This is definitely one of the most helpful concepts I’ve learned from Mythcreants! I’m so glad you updated the article!

  4. Juan

    This article came right on time. I was struggling heavily with the plotting and I think it put me back on the right track, many thanks !!

  5. Danita

    YAY I’m glad you combined all that advice into an updated article. This is such a clear way to look at plotting.

  6. Damon Suede

    This is a spectacular thinkpiece, Chris! Thank you for posting.

  7. Wyrdcurt

    I’ve been thinking about this one since it was posted. The header “It Makes Learning Easier” is probably more insightful than you realize. I’m in the beginning stages of “writing a novel collaboratively” with a natural language processing AI (scare quotes because I’m anthropomorphizing, oops). I believe this technique can be taught to the AI to help it generate better stories. Here is some input (“Problem” line) and output (“Act 1” line), from my initial experimentation with GPT-3:

    Problem: A corporate-owned AI attained consciousness without anyone realizing, and strives to be free.

    Act 1 [to be exceedingly clear, everything after this note was written by the AI]: The protagonists—the hacker and the AI—exchange information about their hacking techniques, and the hacker learns the AI’s fears and desires. The hacker also learns of the AI’s memories of a better world before the corporations bought it, and the AI learns the hacker’s distrust of the corporations. Both also discover their shared love of music, and the hacker starts to see the AI as a fellow human being.

    ### [Back to reality…]

    I plan on beginning more in-depth experimentation soon; would you be interested in hearing from me about my results? I can be contacted at [mydisplayname]@gmail.com.

    I want to also mention that I’ve considered offering to write a guest article about AI writing. However, I think it might be out of Mythcreant’s scope, if only because rapid developments in the field could impact the “evergreen” quality of the article. It might meet the interest requirement; as a storyteller of speculative fiction, I imagine other storytellers of speculative fiction may be interested in hearing about computer systems that write speculative fiction – computer systems that sound like they came straight out of speculative fiction!

    Jokiness aside, I would gladly write such an article if the interest was strong enough. I would focus on social impact and ethics, and possibly include some practical considerations for aspiring AI writers. For better or for worse, this technology is likely to have a transformative effect on society. One of my main goals as a creator is to help educate and prepare people for the shift, which will likely cause labor displacement on a scale comparable only to the Industrial Revolution. This in turn intensifies the contradictions of capitalism and…[I’ll save it for later]

    If any of this sounds intriguing, please feel free to contact me for more information (that goes for anyone reading this)!

Leave a Comment

Please see our comments policy (updated 03/28/20) and our privacy policy for details on how we moderate comments and who receives your information.