Six Reasons You Should Read Discworld

Discworld is an expansive fantasy series created by Terry Pratchett. It features a flat, disc-shaped world (who would have guessed) resting upon the backs of four enormous elephants standing on the shell of a giant turtle, the Great A’Tuin. It’s made up of multiple series following different groups of characters, as well as a plethora of stand-alone novels. As anyone listening to some of our podcasts can tell you, I am a rabid Discworld fan. These books are absolutely amazing; in fact, they are some of the best stories written by a modern author, the kind that will help define today’s literature for future generations. I hope that everything I just said is second nature to you. If not, here are just a few reasons start reading as soon as possible.

Warning: minor spoilers for several Discworld Books, but nothing that will make reading them less fun. I’d never do that to you.

1. It Uses New Tricks with Old Tropes

Wizards Discworld

Fantasy is absolutely full of tropes, and the same ones tend to pop up over and over again, likely because a handful of authors like Tolkien and Howard were very influential to the genre in its early years. Elves are beautiful, mysterious, superior beings who act in ways too grand for humans to grasp. Trolls are stupid brutes who exist primarily as a challenge to high level adventurers. We are used to wise and powerful wizards standing beside righteous heroes with bulging muscles.

Discworld turns all of that on its head. The elements fantasy readers expect are all there- elves, wizards, and heroes still roam the land- but they are not at all what we expect. Pratchett’s wizards in particular are a great example. They start off as pure satire; a bunch of power-hungry schemers and backstabbers, in contrast to the noble virtues of Gandalf or Merlin. However, as the books go forward, things change drastically.

Rather than simply mocking traditional fantasy stories, Discworld wizards forge their own path. They transform into a profession where the goal is to learn as much magic as they can, while at the same time using as little as possible. After all, any commoner can go around not using magic, but for a wizard who could bend the universe to their will, not doing so is a sign of restraint and wisdom. Besides that, magic is really hard, and wizards in Discworld are much like any other group of humans – they avoid hard work when it isn’t necessary. The ultimate goal of a Discworld wizard is to be so wise and knowledgeable that your days can be filled with nothing but large meals and lazy afternoons with a good pipe. Let the younger ones rush off and do the hard work.

An even better example of trope subversion are the elves of Discworld. They are absolutely terrifying in an almost Lovecraftian way, and Pratchett accomplishes this without losing any of the traits that elves are known for. They are immortal and eternally beautiful, and this makes them see the fleeting life of the human world as something amusing to be toyed with. They are powerful beyond mortal ken, and that power gives them the feeling of absolute superiority.

Pratchett’s elves are a lot like cats, actually, which is a comparison he makes in Lords and Ladies. They toy with human affections in the same way a cat toys with its food, and the end result is similarly brutal. Not only is this an interesting take on a fantasy race that has become more than a little clichéd, but it gives food for thought on the way elves have been portrayed in other works. Why are they always shown as being prettier, more capable versions of humans? Why is their psychology so similar to ours despite the vast biological differences? Despite the otherworldly horror Discworld elves invoke, they also come off as being better developed than their portrayal by other authors.

2. It’s Full of Complex Characters


There’s a common idea that speculative fiction books are about plot, while literary books are about characters. Discworld takes that idea and throws it out the window. From the magically charged peaks of the Ramtop Mountains to the grimy streets of Ankh-Morpork, this series is full of characters that feel like living, breathing people, with all the quirks and idiosyncrasies that entails. There is a character in Thud! who for all the world seems like a stereotypical cowardly bureaucrat, only for him to completely reverse course and become a brave and loyal, if physically incapable, officer of the Watch. When this transformation occurs, it somehow makes complete sense with everything that has been established about the character so far.

Discworld is full of such characters, and I would be here all day trying to name them all, so here are two that embody Pratchett’s ability to conjure living people on the page.

Esmerelda Weatherwax: Known as Granny Weatherwax, or sometimes just Granny, this old woman is a creature of contradictions. At first glance she seems every inch the evil witch. She wears only black, rides a broom, has a broken down cottage in the woods, and never goes anywhere without her pointy black hat. However, it quickly becomes clear this is not the case. Granny is vital to the kingdom around her. She treats the sick, sorts out disputes, and oversees the birth of new children. Occasionally, she and her fellow witches even defend their homeland of Lancre from whatever menace is about to befall it.

Just when you think Granny is purely a good character and the evil witch stuff is just for show, Pratchett lets slip something that makes you doubt. People are afraid of Granny, and sometimes with good reason. There is a deep anger within her, and it can be terrible when roused. She works to control it, but it’s a struggle. She’s closer to the edge than she can ever admit. Granny goes through most of her life without using any overt magic, but every once in a while something will happen to bring out her real power, and that’s when you had better beware.

To add another level of complication, Granny gets older in each book where she appears. At first this is fine- Granny’s age is a badge of pride for her- but eventually the years start to take their toll. She must grapple with the fact that she won’t always be the most powerful witch in the Ramtops. There are younger, up and coming witches who may supplant her. Watching such a well established character struggle with her impending mortality elevates Pratchett’s writing even higher.

Samuel Vimes: The story of Vimes is a long and complicated one. He begins with rather humble roots, an alcoholic veteran of the much maligned Ankh-Morpork City Watch. He lives in defiance of the swirling mass of plots and intrigues which govern the city around him, insisting that a policeman’s job is simple: catch the bad guy. Of course, his job is never simple. The glorious thing about Vimes is that he slowly, over the course of half a dozen books, becomes an expert in all of the aspects of Ankh-Morpork life he despises.

Plotting, for instance. Vimes believes with all his heart that the Watch must stay out of politics. As he sees it, their job is to keep the peace, not make secret plans in dark rooms. But what happens when those secret plans become a threat to the peace Vimes keeps? In books like Thud! and Jingo, we see that Vimes could have had a bright career as a scheming political mastermind. He’s incredibly smart, held back only by his unshakeable, though often twisted, sense of morality. He hates the upper classes, but in later books he is made a duke of the city, and must deal with all the responsibilities that come with it.

Perhaps even more interesting is Vimes’ battle with alcohol. His drinking fluctuates throughout the book, with no clear cut off point where he decides once and for all not to touch another drop. It is a slow, painful process for Vimes to sober himself up. In some stories he’s doing very well, and in others he crashes and falls back in his destructive habits.

A final and brilliant twist comes to the character with the birth of his son. Vimes, a character built entirely out of grit and stubbornness, falls completely to pieces in order to nurture his child. An entire plot revolves around him getting home on time to read Sam Jr. to sleep at night. This is a particularly beautiful bit of writing because nurturing fathers are so rare in genre fiction. Usually, the father is distant, an unemotional role model at best and a straight up villain at worst. Instead, Vimes cares for his son so deeply that it’s made me tear up on more than one occasion.

3. It Explores Racial Tensions


Let’s face it, fantasy stories tend to put the non-human races into boxes. They get universal traits that apply to every member of the species. Elves are all beautiful, dwarves love to drink, halflings are mischievous and thieving, et cetera. These boxes often include built-in racial conflicts as well. Elves almost always hate dwarves, no matter what the setting. More often than not, very little thought is given to why these conflicts exist. They just do, and that’s the end of it.

Not so in Discworld! The novel Thud! focuses on the centuries-old conflict between dwarves and trolls, but not at all in the way it is normally done. Instead of assuming this conflict is predestined by genetics, Pratchett frames the conflict as similar to the reason two groups of humans will go on fighting each other generation after generation. At some time in the past, some event happened to start the conflict, and both sides blamed the other. Trolls claim that the dwarves are murderous psychopaths who want nothing more than to carve up their stony hides into tiny chunks. Dwarves claim that trolls are stupid oafs who will betray and devour you at the first opportunity.

Just as in real life, neither side has the whole truth. History is twisted by both trolls and dwarves to suit their own purposes, with very little thought given to what actually happened. At the same time, Thud! avoids painting the entirety of either group with the same brush. There are members of both races who reject the old conflict to come together, and Pratchett makes it clear that this is the only way forward. Continued fighting will only make life worse for both groups, even if one were to eventually “win” in the end. At the same time, there are some who are so devoted to the hatred built up over long years that they will actively try to stop any momentum towards peace.

Discworld also looks at conflict between groups of plain old humans, particularly in Jingo. When Ankh-Morpork goes to war with neighboring Klatch, Pratchett focuses on all the fallout such a conflict creates. First and foremost is the paranoid distrust of anyone who shares an ancestry with the enemy nation. Klatchians in Ankh-Morpork, many of them having lived in the city for generations, become the targets of suspicion and sometimes outright violence.

The parallels to how Japanese Americans were treated in WWII, and how Muslims in the west are treated right now, are unmistakable. It shows not only how the current “other” suffers from this treatment, but how the act of discrimination damages the people performing it as well. Pratchett somehow manages to describe both the laughable absurdity of judging someone based on their ethnicity, but also how easy it is for otherwise good people to slip down that dark path.

4. It Takes On Sexism


I’ve talked before about how some fantasy series can end up being really sexist in their portrayal of women. Fortunately, Discworld goes in the opposite direction, telling stories about interesting women and the problems they face in their societies. That is not to say every female character Pratchett writes is defined by the prejudice she endures, but he tells this particular kind of story very well.

Discworld is full of stories where women take on tasks traditionally dominated by men. Monstrous Regiment in particular is a story of a woman named Polly, who dresses as a man in order to join the army in the highly conservative country of Borogravia. Rather than the straightforward tale of battlefield heroism you might expect, Pratchett takes great pains to show both the absurdity and ugliness of war. Beyond that, the story examines the sexism of Borogravia with a holistic eye. It’s shown to be systemic to the whole society, not just a little problem the army has which can be easily hand waved away at the end.

One of the best parts is when Polly and several other women land in a lot of trouble because they were caught doing “men’s business.” A way out is offered to them, in which their actions can be interpreted as culturally acceptable, so long as they make it clear they were merely acting as support for the real heroes, Borogravia’s men. This is a moment of serious conflict for the characters. They really aren’t looking to throw themselves at martyrdom, but can they live with letting the entrenched system sweep their deeds under the rug?

Something else that makes Monstrous Regiment so effective is that the book doesn’t demonize femininity or its associated roles. For some characters, the struggle is to be accepted in a traditionally masculine role, for others it is to do what they already do on their own terms.

Equal Rites is a story that runs along similar lines. It’s about Eskarina Smith, a girl who wants to be a wizard. Of course, girls can’t be wizards, because… Well, because! Girls become witches, and boys become wizards, and that’s how it’s always been. Many of the characters go on at length about how the sexes do very different types of magic. Granny Weatherwax has absolute disdain for the showy and impractical explosions of wizard magic, while Archchancellor Cuteangle dismisses witchcraft as little more than herbalism.

The secret is, of course, that witch magic and wizard magic are different because they use different methodologies, not because of the chromosomes anyone is born with. Men can learn to be witches, and women can learn to be wizards. It’s just that they live in a society which pushes them into specific roles. I don’t know if Equal Rites was meant as a deliberate commentary on series like the Wheel of Time, but it works brilliantly regardless.

5. It Challenges Gender Norms

Discworld may not be the only fantasy series to promote equality between men women, but it is the only one I know of to question what those genders actually mean*. The idea that gender may not be a male/female toggle switch is one that our real life society has difficulty even acknowledging, so naturally Pratchett had to write a story about it. Even better, this progressive story is born out of that trite “joke” that fantasy stories are always asking: do dwarven women have beards?

Dwarves on the Disc have two sexes, but only one gender: dwarf. The idea that there should be any difference between male and female once the baby can eat solid food simply doesn’t exist. Everyone dresses in chainmail armor, carries an arsenal of bladed weapons, and sports a mighty beard. There is “equality” of a sort, but it’s really more a case of extreme conformity.

Of course, no society is completely static, and things do slowly begin to change in books like Feet of Clay and The Fifth Elephant. The character Cheery Littlebottom of the City Watch becomes a focus for this ongoing story thread, as she makes the decision to reject the uniformity of dwarven society and express her femininity by wearing a skirt and getting some high heels. She makes it clear to the world that she is female, in addition to being a dwarf.

At first, Cheery’s fellow officers are put off. They’ve never seen a dwarf do anything like this, and they don’t know how to handle it. However, because they are for the most part decent people, they come around and support her. When Cherry’s appearance causes friction with the conservative elements of dwarven society, the City Watch makes it clear any problem with her is a problem with all of them. Not only is the story groundbreaking, it’s uplifting and positive as well.

A final element to Cherry’s arc that I think really completes it is that she doesn’t end up as a short version of a traditionally feminine human woman. Her skirt is armored leather, and her heels are metal spikes welded to her boots. She remains proud of her beard. She creates herself an identity that fits who she is rather than having to pick one from off of society’s shelf.

6. It Includes Scifi Ideas in a Fantasy Setting

The Gonne

Many classic scifi stories focus primarily on a single piece of technology and all the ramifications that come from it. Blade Runner was about the implications of robots being able to imitate human behavior. Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea imagined a submarine unleashed on the oceans of 1870. In this way, science fiction has made numerous predictions and commentaries about our society, cementing the genre’s value as a bastion of critical thought. As you may have guessed, I’m about to tell you that Discworld does this too.

One facet of Pratchett’s world is that many advances are held back – not because the technology doesn’t exist, but because social pressures keep them out of common use. This is a marvelous setup for a technology springing up quickly and changing the way people live overnight, and that’s exactly what happens in The Truth. The basic plot is that a group of adventurous dwarves come to Ankh-Morpork with the first commercial printing press. Suddenly, words can be put on paper with speed and accuracy unimaginable with previous technology. This leads to the publication of the Disc’s first newspaper, which is when things really go crazy.

You see, prior to these events, people in Discworld had very little access to information. They could either get it by word of mouth, or from unreliable town criers. The newspaper changes everything. Out of nowhere there is a cheap and readily available source of information about what is going on in the world. People suddenly have opinions about things they didn’t know existed. The leaders of Ankh-Morpork find themselves under an unprecedented level of scrutiny, and they don’t much like it.

The Truth also dives headlong into the problems faced by journalists. People are often more interested in a fantastic lie than a mundane reality. The characters struggle with balancing their reports of geopolitical intrigue against pictures of funny shaped vegetables. Even when people are interested in the important stories, they often come up with opinions that aren’t what the characters expected at all. Add in some cats, and it could easily be a story about the Internet.

A more chilling example is from Men at Arms: the gonne. Readers from outside the Disc might know it as a gun. For the most part, people who want to kill each other in Discworld need to work hard at it. Swords require getting up close and personal, bows take years of training to use properly, and even crossbows can only fire once at limited range before becoming oddly shaped clubs.

The gonne is different. It can kill from a long ways off, with the pull of a trigger, and it’s got a very simple point and click aiming system. If you miss, just load another bullet. In short, the gonne makes killing an impersonal affair, something that can be done almost casually. In Men at Arms, it functions almost like the One Ring, seeming to have a mind of its own. Whether it actually does, or if the people holding it simply realize how easy it would be to accomplish their desires, the results are the same. With the gonne in your hands, everyone slowly starts to look like a target.

The gonne can be an analogy for any sudden improvement in weapons technology, though my favorite is the atomic bomb. Nothing like it has ever existed before, the temptation to use it is nearly irresistible, and the results are catastrophic. One of the most powerful moments in the book is when Vimes briefly holds the gonne in his hands. He sees how easy it would be to rid Ankh-Morpork of all its problems with a few simple pulls of the trigger. In a few paragraphs, Terry Pratchett perfectly encapsulates the allure of power, and how there are certain kinds of power that no one can be trusted to use.

There are so many more reasons why the Discworld books are must-reads for people who enjoy good stories. Pratchett’s humor hits you in all the best and least expected places. He is one of the few authors who can regularly make me cry when reading his books. I don’t have time list every reason, and we’d be here all day if I did. It’s my hope that people eventually start thinking of Discworld in the same way we think of Lord of the Rings or Harry Potter – classics that must be read- because the stories are just that good.

P.S. Our bills are paid by our wonderful patrons. Could you chip in?

Read more about ,



  1. TrishM

    Ah, you’ve nailed Terry Pratchett, and marvelously! Highlighting my two all-time favorite characters helps as well.

    I agree that Pratchett is likely the greatest writer of our times (and that’s coming from an English professor). While he has a large following now, in time I see that increasing. His satire on our world is brilliant; his characters, complex and believable (I think I have a crush on Sam Vimes); his analyses, deep and hilarious. How he spikes everything with humor is inspiring. I read each of his novels twice through, each time I pick up one of the 30 I own. The first time, I wallow in the tale. The second read, I take notes as to how he did it all.
    Thanks for a great post. And to think I put down “Making Money” (fourth read) to go through this!

  2. Bill

    You have some excellent points about Terry Pratchett’s genius.

    However, I would point out that his innovative take on sexism and gender norms tends to ignore men. For example, there are several unfortunate anti-gay jokes in his books and several jokes mocking male victims of rape; one quick jest in one of his short stories involves Nanny Ogg happily approving of the idea of using magic to force men to have sex with a witch against their wills. Real life male victims of sexual assault will find no respite in Mr. Pratchett’s otherwise-fine writings.

    Although one applauds Mr. Pratchett for taking on sexism against women, one wishes he might also have shown as much sympathy for men wishing to be witches as he shows for women wishing to be wizards (instead, male would-be witches are dismissed as silly old men calling themselves “warlocks”), and although Cherry Littlebottom is supported by the guard for wearing lipstick, one has less faith that a gay member of the guard would be accepted and supported.

    • Duncan

      The last book does in fact cover a man becoming a witch, among other things. Looks like a character who had plenty of room to grow into too (like just about all of Pratchett’s characters). Sadly we’ll never know where he intended to take it

      • Oren Ashkenazi

        Shepard’s Crown was really good. I loved how there was a boy who wanted to be a witch, and he didn’t immediately become the BEST witch. It gave me tears.

  3. Zizekesha

    “Everyone dresses in chainmail armor, carries an arsenal of bladed weapons, and sports a mighty beard…”

    Then how does sexual attraction occur?

    • Oren Ashkenazi

      Very carefully, one would assume.

    • Duncan

      Generally, once there is attraction, there are discreet enquiries made to the subject of one’s attraction as to their actual sex

    • John

      The usual way, including some subconscious pheromone effects. Any dwarven couple which turns out to be unable to conceive a child, for some otherwise-irrelevant medical reason, could simply adopt. When the society’s cultural touchstones are mineral extraction, violence, and high-proof alcohol, there’s not likely to be any desperate scarcity of orphans.

      • Cay Reet

        We know the Discworld dwarves adopt, because of Captain Carrot, who was raised by them while clearly not even being a dwarf himself.

  4. sona

    Hello, where do you have the Cheery Littlebottom picture from? Have you done it yourself?

  5. Rand al'Thor

    What system would you recommend for Discworld as an RPG? Just asking I don’t want to or anything….

    • Oren Ashkenazi

      You know, as much as I love Discworld, I wouldn’t recommend running a game in it. DW stories depend too much on a dramatic irony and incredibly intricate foreshadowing that’s nearly impossible to pull off at the table.

      Many Discworld stories also end in ways I think would be very frustrating for PCs. Imagine playing through Jingo, only to find out at the end that the whole thing was a plot by Vetinari?

      That said, if you’re set on the idea, I’d recommend Burning Wheel. It has the kind of attention to detail that Pratchett uses a lot in his stories. Alternative, something really rules light like Fate or Primetime Adventures would probably work.

      • Rand al'Thor

        I recommend Burning Wheel for most things fantasy. Fate works for pretty much everything. Thank you for the information. What are the differences between Fate and Fudge? I haven’t tried Fate yet because RPG Rulebooks are pretty expensive and I want to know what I’m getting.

      • Oren Ashkenazi

        Fate is basically Fudge with a more complete system. I’m not a huge Fate fan, but it does work for games where you really need a more narrative style. Bonus round, you can download the core rules for pay what you like!

    • Dave L

      GURPS has two Discworld supplements

  6. Rand al'Thor

    So it goes like this:
    D&D or BW= Best Fantasy System (D&D for popularity)
    CoC=Most Well Known Horror (kind of, the best being World of Darkness)
    What is the best system for sic-fi? Burning Empires because of it’s Luke Crane core?

    • Oren Ashkenazi

      Well, I’d contest that D&D deserves that spot for being well known, but that’s neither here nor there.

      We’re actually kind of strapped for good Sci Fi systems. Burning Empire is probably my least favorite Luke Crane game. It’s narrative structure and scene building rules are very restrictive on what the GM is allowed to do, limiting your ability to make course corrections.

      Every game of rules as written BE I’ve played has ended the same way, with the PCs all wandering off in different directions and not wanting to interact. under BE’s rules, I didn’t have the power to bring them back together or introduce a new enemy that would require them to cooperate.

      That said, if you tear out all the narrative and scene building, BE works pretty well. I’ve heard a lot of good things about Eclipse Phase, but I’ve never tried it.

      • Rand al'Thor

        Thanks for the information Oren. I like the free PDF recommendation. I might try running a game using Fate.

  7. Rand al'Thor

    I just noticed that re-reading Color of Magic and then Equal Rites (been a long time) Equal Rites isn’t as good for some reason. In Color of Magic Rincewind explained how hard being a wizard is. Basically making fun of the Vancian, D&D type magic system. In Equal Rites wizards are portrayed as fireball-wielding all-mighty figures. Do you know why?

    • Oren Ashkenazi

      In most DW books, the Wizards are a stand in for Men With Power, or the Patriarchy. Pratchet has a very low opinion of Men With Power, and so in most of his books, the Wizards are kind of bumbling dolts who do the world a favor by not messing with it.

      But in Equal Rites, Esk wants to be a wizard, so the wizards had to be something worth being. It wouldn’t have had much punch if the plot was “Esk wants to join a group of lazy old men who do nothing but eat lots of food all day.”

      • Rand al'Thor

        Thank you so much. The short story “The Wizards of Perfidy” has some… interesting wizards.

  8. Bess Marvin

    I tried Discworld once and didn’t care for it. Years later I tried again and was pleasantly surprised by how much I liked it after finishing Mort. The series is now a great love of mine and I tell anyone who asks for book recommendations around Christmas to read Hogfather.

    You’ve covered some excellent examples here, but I am a little disappointed this article doesn’t mention Death as pro of reading the series. He’s one of the most beloved characters.

  9. Sheila joss

    Perhaps even more interesting is Vimes’ battle with alcohol. His drinking fluctuates throughout the book, with no clear cut off point where he decides once and for all not to touch another drop. It is a slow, painful process for Vimes to sober himself up. In some stories he’s doing very well, and in others he crashes and falls back in his destructive habits.”

    I don’t remember Vimes drinking again after Men at Arms….can someone tell me where the crashing back to bad habits occurs please?

    • Oren Ashkenazi

      Yeah that was just me remembering wrong. What actually happened was that in some books he was more tempted to drink than others, but he never actually goes back.

  10. Gus

    Lovely analysis. I would add the Golem rights, the ascencion of the Goblins and later the Orcs and the take about organized religion, the inquisition and philosophy in this wonderful list.

  11. I, User

    “The idea that gender may not be a male/female toggle switch is one that our real life society has difficulty even acknowledging”

    I’m not trying to be snide or something, but I have an honest question: What is the basis of your belief that there are more than two genders? I have heard some pretty convincing cases for why there are only two genders but I haven’t seen anything from the other side of the debate. Care to explain?

    • Oren Ashkenazi

      Sure. The short version is that gender is a social construct, while sex is based on biological features. That doesn’t mean gender isn’t real. Money is a social construct too. It just means that gender is malleable. Different cultures have had more than two genders in the past, there’s no reason we can’t have them now.

      Also, while sex is based on biological features, it isn’t a simple binary either. People with XY chromosomes are sometimes born with female genitalia, for example.

      The American Psychological Association talks about this:

      Bill Nye talked about it on episode nine of his Netflix show: Bill Nye Saves the World.

      Rosemary Joyce, Ph.D of Anthropology, also talks about it.

      The bottom line is that even if someone doesn’t accept the arguments and believes in the gender binary, many people feel strongly that they do not fit into the binary, and demanding that they conform does nothing but harm them.

      On the other hand, believing someone when they say they are neither a man or a woman costs us nothing.

  12. Cay Reet

    #7: It’s DISCWORLD – ’nuff said.

    I really, really love all of Sam Vimes’ novels. He’s a great character and I like his regular meetings with Lord Vetinari. After all, when all’s said and done, they both want stability for the city, but have very different views on how it should be achieved – keeping to the law or being pragmatic about things.

    I also love quite some of the witch stuff, especially since Pratchett used them a lot when making literal references to other books, such as “Lords and Ladies” (which goes towards “A Midsummer Night’s Dream” with elves of horror) and “Masquerade” (which does a good job of transporting “The Phantom of the Opera” into the Discworld setting). Or the many myths and stories about vampires he uses in “Carpe Jugulum.”

  13. Cay Reet

    I just finished a nice non-fiction book about the women of Discworld by Tansy Raynar Roberts (so glad it’s now out as an e-book – last time I checked for it, it was out of print and the few books on the market were expensive, but for this, Girl Reporter is now unavailable – like, WHAT?). The full title is “Pratchett’s Women: Unauthorized Essays on Female Characters of the Discworld.”

    I find her take on Monstrous Regiment especially interesting, because she writes that she originally didn’t like the book’s conclusion much and fought with working her original essay over for the collection this year.

  14. A Perspiring Writer

    Just out of curiosity, Oren, what do you think about the BBC’s upcoming Discworld “adaptation”.

    It’s called ‘The Watch’ and it looks…


    *And not in a good way**.
    **In fact, it makes me so upset that I won’t even use any*** of these footnote gags I use a lot.
    ***Well, any MORE…

    • A Perspiring Writer

      question mark i forgot the question mark

    • Oren Ashkenazi

      Based on the one trailer we have, so far it looks fine to me. Could be good, could be bad, but I’m really confused at all the people who are like “this isn’t MY Discworld” because it doesn’t have the same colorscheme as previous adaptations.

      I’ll be as irritated as anyone else if the show turns out to be grimdark but I think it’s way to early to make that assumption.

      • A Perspiring Writer

        Apparently, the reason most fans are upset* is because the trailer seems very… ‘in name only’**.

        People were expecting either a faithful adaptation of the books, or an original story that captures the spirit. And the show doesn’t seem like either of those.

        It’s not really the colorscheme; more like the general aesthetic. The characters seem wildly different***, but the show purports itself to be ‘based on the books’. Personally, I don’t see it. Hence, ‘in name only’.

        The general consensus is that it feels like an original work with original characters that just has the Discworld name and City Watch characters slapped on.

        Maybe that will change in time. But for now, I don’t really have much confidence in them to pull this off****.

        *Aside from the creator not really giving any credit to Terry Pratchett. You know, the guy who WROTE the books they’re ‘adapting’.
        **They basically took the names and general setting and changed pretty much anything and everything else.
        ***Boy, did they do Death dirty. He’s not supposed to look like a Jawa!
        ****I’m actually surprised; I wasn’t expecting your reaction to the trailer to be as ‘meh’ as it is.

Leave a Comment

Please see our comments policy (updated 03/28/20) and our privacy policy for details on how we moderate comments and who receives your information.