Storytelling

How Storytellers Use Reactivity & Proactivity for Effect

Neo from the Matrix clings to the outside of a skyscraper
Many stories put their main characters through an uncomfortable period of disempowerment so the audience can watch them overcome it. But when creating these sequences, storytellers can struggle with character agency. After all, if the character is making choices that affect the plot, doesn’t that mean they’re empowered? Actually no, it doesn’t have to. The tool that storytellers use to create empowerment and disempowerment is proactivity. While a proactive character probably has more agency, a reactive character can still have it. Let’s compare two stories to examine how they use proactivity to set the tone while preserving character agency.

The Matrix

Neo sleeps at his desk with the glow of his computer screen over his face

When the movie opens, Neo is a very reactive character. This is designed to strengthen the movie’s theme: Neo is Alice from Alice in Wonderland, tumbling down the rabbit hole toward a new world. Accordingly, Neo has no idea what’s happening and little control over it. Other people are the big actors, and he’s caught between them.

However, the Wachowski sisters didn’t just leave Neo to be strung along or captured without his input. They gave him agency by inserting key decision points that alter the plot. Let’s look at how they did that.

In the first scene with Neo, he wakes up to see some mysterious writing appear on his computer. It tells him to follow the white rabbit. He’s not sure if he dreamed it, but right after, a group stops by and invites him to a club. One of the women has a white rabbit tattoo, so Neo agrees to go with them.

Club goers stand in a dark hallway, a woman among them has a white rabbit tattoo on the back of her shoulder

Previously, I said that if a character does what they are told, they have no agency. However, this is an exception, because following these directions is the farthest thing from a no-brainer. It’s not a knowledgeable mentor telling Neo what to do; it’s a mysterious presence that may not be real, let alone trustworthy. Plus, Neo says no to the invitation at first, then changes his mind after seeing the tattoo. This emphasizes that he doesn’t have to follow the directions; it’s his personal decision.

Later, Neo has his first brush with agents. Again, a mysterious entity (Morpheus) contacts him and tells him what to do to escape. But this time, Neo’s not happy with the directions – they’re too dangerous. So Morpheus simply tells Neo that he has a choice: risk climbing to a scaffold on the exterior of his office building or get caught by the agents. Neo’s options are limited, but he still has them. This is much like the famous scene where Morpheus offers Neo a choice between a red pill or a blue one. Neo can take the red pill to continue his wild journey or the blue pill to cut it short.

In the reflection of a black man's sunglasses, a man reaches for the red pill in one hand instead of the blue pill in the other.

It’s also worth noting how important these decisions are for characterization. Neo doesn’t say a lot, so without these choices, we wouldn’t know much about him. His decision to follow the white rabbit and take the red pill tells us that he’s desperate for a change in his life. However, because he chooses to be captured by the agents, we also know he isn’t so desperate that he’s suicidal. This cautious decision also creates a great contrast with the actions he takes later.

After taking the red pill, Neo goes through a series of training sequences that educate both him and viewers about the world and prepare him for heroism. These are slower scenes with low stakes, but their entertainment value is boosted by the novelty of encountering the new world for the first time.

Then the plot ramps back up again. Team Good goes into the Matrix to bring Neo to see the Oracle, but during the trip, Morpheus is captured. Since it’s only a matter of time before the agents extract vital security information from Morpheus, Team Good feels their only option is to kill Morpheus first.

At this point, Neo makes a sudden change from reactive to proactive. He tells his crewmates to leave Morpheus alive, because Neo is certain that he can save him. No one asks Neo to make a choice here; if he simply does nothing, Morpheus will die. Neo’s decision to head back into the Matrix is his own idea, of his own volition. After that, he continues his proactive streak by planning the rescue mission, asking to be equipped with lots of guns.

In the Matrix, Trinity and Neo are in a lobby with dramatic black clothes and holding two guns each

The sudden switch from reacting to proactively planning makes these scenes feel really empowering. Neo is finally at home in wonderland, and his confident mannerisms and badass fight sequences emphasize how far he’s come from the man who wouldn’t risk reaching a scaffold. The Matrix is now a more typical action movie with an action hero.

Stardust

A young man and woman having a candlelight picnic at night

This movie is a light romp, and accordingly, it has a protagonist who is proactive from almost the beginning. There’s just one reactive scene in the opening where Tristan, the main character, is made to choose between behaving professionally at work and pleasing his crush. He chooses his crush and is fired for it.

After a pep talk from his father, Tristan’s ready to make proactive plans. His crush isn’t impressed by him, so he sets up a romantic evening picnic and asks her to join him. When she tells him she’s planning on accepting the proposal of another suitor, Tristan tells her that he’ll fetch her a fallen star if she’ll marry him. She agrees, and he sets off into the fairy realm to get the star. So unlike Neo, who is approached by a mysterious presence and asked if he wants to cross into a new world, Tristan proactively crosses to achieve his goals.

Tristan finds the star, who is also a woman named Yvaine, and kidnaps her – because it’s not a heterosexual romance if he doesn’t steal her agency, amiright? Then they try to make their way back to Tristan’s village. The only time his quest doesn’t drive the story is when the villains put Yvaine in danger, and Tristan rushes to rescue her. These are reactive sequences with much higher tension.

Tristan finds a blond woman wearing a silver dress lying in a crater

Let’s have a look at the first rescue. Yvaine has escaped from Tristan on a unicorn, but she and the unicorn have fallen into a trap. Tristan has no idea what’s happening, so the stars in the sky tell him not only that Yvaine is in danger, but also that he must get on a moving carriage nearby to reach her in time. Since he’s following the directions of what’s supposed to be a trustworthy guide, Tristan doesn’t have agency in these actions. However, he has to convince the carriage driver to let him on, and that does give him agency.

After Tristan reaches Yvaine, they escape the villain by using a magic candle. Even though they have to think of a destination together to escape with the candle, he has agency and she doesn’t. That’s because using the candle is his idea. This is important to keep in mind whenever protagonists need to solve problems together. The character who comes up with the ideas and plans has the most agency for that child arc.

Tristan and Evane stand in a great hall full of shattered glass, they look frightened

The rescue sequences in Stardust provide an interesting contrast with The Matrix. In Stardust, they are reactive sequences that raise tension. In the Matrix, they are proactive and empowering. But in The Matrix, a rescue mission is dismissed by Team Good as impossible, so Neo’s plan feels like a dramatic intervention in the course of events. In Stardust, rescuing Yvaine feels like the natural response to Tristan’s MacGuffin/love interest being captured, and Tristan is simply told to do it the first time. Of course, they also feel different because viewers will compare them with the movie up until that point, and these movies have very different levels of proactivity.


As you might have noticed, reactive sequences are generally better for darker and tenser stories. Accordingly, horror stories are most likely to rely on reactive sequences. But even horror stories are known for making their heroine more proactive before the climax. I think that’s because the longer the main character is reactive, the more satisfying it feels when that changes. Few storytellers want to give up that opportunity.

 

Comments

  1. Brigitta M.

    My FMC Naomh is in therapy for her depression. As such, she receives goals from her therapist. Naomh has been primarily reactive for the two weeks leading up to the therapy. If she (mostly) follows through on the goals her therapist sets for her would that be considered reactive or proactive?

    –Bri

    • Cay Reet

      You could give her a bit of inner monologue or something similar to make it clear that she’s thinking about whether or not to go along and decides to do it. That gives her agency and makes her more proactive – just as with Neo in the example above.

      • Brigitta M.

        It’s hard to explain the brain fog of deep depression (which Naomh is still in during the early sessions) but I’ll try. Think of those early mornings when the only thought in your mind is that cup of coffee. Naomh’s brain is like that all day but instead of coffee it’s “hungry, tired, go from point a to point b.” And it gets stuck there until the therapist helps her out.

        She did choose therapy but her inner-monologue isn’t about whether or not she should follow the therapist’s goals or whether or not they make sense it’s more along the lines of Naomh is at the bottom of the well and the therapist is tossing down a rope. Debating on whether or not to grab that rope just isn’t an option.

        It’s the only rope, she’s not going to analyze it for structural strength or whether the person at the other end of it is going to cut it. She just wants out of the well.

        –Bri

        • Cay Reet

          On the other hand, if you phrase it right, the decision to want out of the well is already agenda. She could also sit down and say ‘screw that rope, I’ll stay where I am.’ By wanting out of that well which is her depression, she already has made a choice and she already has gained agenda. It’s only a question of conveying that to the reader.

          • Brigitta M.

            Thanks, I am trying to do that…to show how even the little steps are a constant choice for someone with depression. It’s one thing I feel a lot of stories about depression overlook or gloss over and with good reason. It’s easy to have a character just wallow in their feelings and that makes for dull reading.

            With the advice in this article, as well as yours and Mark’s tips I think I have a way to work through the “dull bits” and still keep them interesting.

            — Bri

        • Lucy

          Maybe I’m super wrong about this, but it sounds to me like you are doing a different type of story – i.e. one that is not really plot driven, but driven by describing the reality of depression. I’d say thinking about whether your character is reactive or proactive is less important in that case. The thing that’s going to make the story work is whether you can really capture that experience and either make someone who hasn’t had depression feel like they have some understanding of what it is like, or make someone who has had it recognise their own experience in it.

    • Mark

      By the examples given in Stardust, it would seem to me that working towards the goals given to her would be reactive, but HOW she works towards them can be proactive?

      I guess it would depend. Did the therapist set the goals as well as the steps to make towards the goals? Or is it up to your MC to decide how to accomplish the goals?

      Did your character have any say or agency in setting the goals, or are they completely directed by the therapist?

      • Brigitta M.

        The therapist sets the goals in accordance to where Naomh is at currently. Early goals are related to basic survival in the world I’ve created while also working towards helping Naomh find her inner joy.

        A basic example from an early session is the therapist asks Naomh how long it’s been since she has practiced magic. It’s been a while and the therapist asks if Naomh enjoyed it. Since Naomh says yes, the therapist sets “practice magic” as one of Naomh’s goals.

        Hmmm…so, from this it seems like it’s reactive with a proactive bundle. Naomh practices magic because her therapist told her (early on she does what the therapist tells her to because she believes it’s a path to mental health so still agency, but reactive agency) to but what spells Naomh works on and for how long is entirely up to Naomh.

        As far as the pacing of my book goes it appears I’m moving in the right direction as it relates to reactive and proactive. Thanks.

        –Bri

        • JGrey

          So the more nebulous/vague the goal/event being reacted to, the more agency the protagonist has?

          • Cay Reet

            The less detailed the directions, the more decisions the protagonist can make for themselves. Decisions equal agency.

  2. Raillery

    I don’t think I’ve been as gripped by a simple breakdown of one aspect in a popular story before as when I read this article. I haven’t seen Stardust but your presentation of the agency subtleties in The Matrix is so concise and insightful, picking out these gems that are hiding in plain sight.

  3. Adam

    Good article! It makes me want to watch The Matrix and Stardust again (two of my favorite movies, next to The Fifth Element).

    I thought for sure you would have mentioned Rogue One, because I swear I remember hearing you discuss in one of your podcasts how Jyn Erso was a reactive character who just followed everyone and got forced into situations and didn’t have much agency herself. Then you compared that to The Force Awakens, wherein Rey was proactive in everything she did.

    In any case, you had some good examples here anyway!

  4. Leon

    Very useful article. I love the Wachowskis.

    Can we still use the red pill or the blue pill metaphor, or have certain unpleasant people ruined it?

    • Chris Winkle

      Since the Matrix was meant as a trans metaphor but had the more gender-bending elements nixed by the production company, I’m personally into reclaiming it.

  5. DJ

    FYI, regarding the Matrix, i believe that the empowerment regarding saving Morpheus is not Neo’s idea. He was asked to make a choice. The entire sequence was predicted by the Oracle. The entire movie is set up with Neo making choices in everything he does.

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Please see our comments policy (updated 03/28/20) and our privacy policy for details on how we moderate comments and who receives your information.