1. Resistance vs Adaptation
In Fire Logic, the protagonists must choose whether to continue brutal guerrilla warfare or accept being a conquered people.We want to believe we shape our own destiny, but reality can make that a lie. The ground could move beneath us, or vengeful foes could descend from above. We might forestall these tidal waves by devoting all we have to the task. But what if we try, and fate still sweeps us aside? If we focus on resisting, we can’t make the best of what we have. By accepting the indignity of our new circumstances, we allow ourselves to adapt.
Example
No one was prepared when the skies were torn asunder. Beings from distant stars had mandated that humanity would join the intergalactic community. Their demand seemed simple: trade. But as the markets flood with cheap alien goods and services, human businesses fail one by one. To keep their bellies full, humans are providing dangerous labor and selling precious Earth resources for pennies. Soon, humans will be little more than slaves. Something must be done, but humanity can’t agree on what. A hero arises, but will the hero side with those who wish to reclaim humanity’s isolation, or those searching for ways to compete in the intergalactic market?2. Justice vs Forgiveness
In the seventh season of Star Trek: Deep Space 9, the crew comes to the aid of an important military defector, even though the defector killed someone close to them.Perpetrators prey on those who are most vulnerable. No matter how they may redeem themselves, we cannot excuse their actions. Asking others to forgive them puts an unfair burden on those who survived abuse. But sometimes accomplishing great good requires accepting those who have committed great evil. If we harvest the fruit of their misdeeds, does it endorse what they did? To avoid further harm, should we ask victims to tolerate the presence of those who mistreated them? Can justice truly be just if innocents suffer from its application?
Example
When the great empire fell, slaves escaped in droves. Across the seas they formed free nations and formed a great alliance to prevent the power-hungry from conquering them again. However, a new threat arises, and the free nations are unprepared. They look for capable allies and find only one: the remnants of the old empire. Those who once owned thousands of slaves still live there in wealth and luxury. They claim they are sorry for enslaving so many, but they hold onto mighty weapons crafted with stolen labor. The free nations are divided; many of the leaders were once slaves. They ask their new hero: should they pardon the crimes of these slave masters and allow them into the alliance?3. Safety vs Hope
In The Martian, the crew of a stranded astronaut risks their lives to rescue him, defying orders from NASA.Tragedy might strike any moment, taking away something or someone dear. If our loved ones are gone forever, we can move on, but we rarely wish to. We grasp for the faintest sliver of hope. But what if maintaining that hope means putting others in jeopardy? Risking all to save a lost soldier may sound heroic, but who will sing our praises when everyone’s dead? Will the people we endanger thank us for risking their lives? We may be forced to decide the cost is too much and let our dearest go.
Example
The Queen was holding a great celebration, open to all, when the palace fell into shadow. Where once stood the home of a beloved monarch and the world’s greatest library, now is gaping darkness. The darkness slowly recedes, but leaves barren land in its wake. A great hero calls together the kingdom’s most powerful mages, and the mages agree: they can stop the darkness from fading, and with it the palace, but the cost may be too great. If shadow realm is not dispelled, it may instead envelope the entire kingdom. The hero must choose, and soon, or it will be too late to save the Queen.4. Loyalty vs Independence
In the Temeraire series, Captain Laurence is a dragon rider loyal to the British, but he discovers that Britain does not value the lives of his dragon friends.Those who take care of us also restrain us. A parent may protect their child while robbing the child of self-determination. A organization may fund a charity while attaching needless strings. How much do we owe those who have given us all we have? Are we bound to honor them, compromising our own needs in the process? Or is it fair to break away as soon as it suits us? When we must choose to remain loyal or pursue our own happiness, we often divide and turn on each other.
Example
Though short on resources, the Interplanetary Science Foundation funded a colony on a promising new planet, hoping to find valuable minerals. The Foundation employees who arrived there went straight to work, setting up new homes and equipment on the Foundation’s dime. But as they grew to love their beautiful new home, they realized that extracting all the minerals their employer needs will irrevocably damage it. The colonists created a plan to become self-sufficient, but they can’t maintain the colony and pay the Foundation back. The Foundation sends a hero to investigate. Will the hero insist the colonists must do as the Foundation wishes or tell the Foundation to let the colony go?5. Kindness vs Prudence
In The Enemy in Star Trek: TNG, the Enterprise decides to answer a distress call from an enemy by trespassing in their territory, creating a potential diplomatic incident.We want to be kind and giving, but being virtuous will not protect us from the consequences of our actions. Assisting an enemy may allow them to regain their strength and turn on us. Helping a friend may cause them to become dependent on us. Making new alliances may also create new enemies. To make the right choice, we may be forced to measure the real suffering we might avert against the suffering our kindness could cause. Then we must ask: how much is our virtue worth?
Example
Two great nations have been allies for centuries, but the northern kingdom grew too confident in their alliance and became reckless. The north spent little on their own defenses, and they provoked their western neighbor by sending settlers into its lands. Now the northern kingdom is ravaged by war and begging its southern ally for help. A heroic warrior and diplomat from the south must decide: is it wise to help the reckless neighbor, making enemies of a powerful kingdom? Or should they leave their friends to die?Most humans can’t be classified as pure good or pure evil, yet we find reasons to fight. By using these divisions in our stories, we can make meaningful commentary, raise the tension, or even allow both sides to win.
P.S. Our bills are paid by our wonderful patrons. Could you chip in?
Great!
I think many of these actually map pretty well to moral foundations theory. 1 would be Liberty/Oppression axis, 2 would be Fairness (as reciprocity)/cheating 4 is loyalty/subversion and 5 is care/harm. Only 3 doesn’t match up.
Actually three can be phrased as “Loyalty to comrades Vs Loyalty to chain-of-command.”
Or in my native tongue:- “Mateship Vs Duty.”
This was a super solid article, a little unsure on the 1st examples, but otherwise it was really strong and provided great frameworks for “No one side is blameless and or, the situation is unfair and complicated” that can create drama or serve as the foundations for a story.
Can you please tell me from which books / stories / games you took the Examples?
Because the Example at 1) speaks of a Science Fiction universe while Fire Logic is fantasy.
Thanks
I believe that the boxed examples were purely original in creation and not pulled from anything preexisting. Fire Logic was used as an instance of a published work utilizing the “Resistance vs. Adaptation” duality, and its inclusion in that section serves to point people in the direction of a book which they can read and learn more about that dynamic from. The boxed example in 1 has no connection to Fire Logic; it’s just meant to show what a “Resistance vs. Adaptation” story might look like.